High Court Grill ABSA & Standard Bank over Property Auctions
High Court Take Standard Bank & ABSA to Task
Banks are nervous that this could happen all the time, in every case and have asked the Johannesburg High Court to provide clarity (the Judge on the case has passed it up to a Full Bench of several judges to decide).
Consumer organisations would like to see the setting of a reserve price for all such judgments to prevent the situation where credit providers sell a property for a pittance and then leave consumers with huge debts they still need to pay off anyway.
‘the Judges gave the banks representatives a hard time complaining that the banks seldom bring all the needed information to court so that they can make a decent ruling’
At the hearing about the matter, the Judges gave the banks representatives a hard time complaining that the banks seldom bring all the needed information to court so that they can make a decent ruling. This wastes the courts time and resources in an already busy schedule.
It is common for banks to not provide the original signed documentation relating to the bond agreement (maybe because it was lost in a phantom fire or some such reason) and rather simply supply an affidavit and some supplementary documents which they say are “similar‘ to those the consumer signed. This results in many matters being postponed unnecessarily.
Securitisation
Hidden behind the arguments was credit providers desire to have an order granted which will allow them to claim insurance on the bonds in question. The court arguments, however, did not directly touch on the topic of securitisation (which is an extremely sensitive topic internationally). It seems that both sides have decided to steer clear of the topic entirely in this case.